Skip to content

Coverage Analysis

Coverage analysis maps which arguments each side responds to. It shows you what’s been directly contradicted, what’s been partially addressed, and what’s been completely ignored.

The other side explicitly addresses the argument with a counter-argument or rebuttal.

The other side touches on the topic but doesn’t fully address the argument — e.g., responding to part of a multi-pronged claim.

The argument is not addressed at all. These become the most critical gaps.

Some responses appeared after court intervention (e.g., after a judge asked specific questions). Garry tracks this timeline so you can see how the argument developed.

The coverage matrix shows your arguments on one axis and the counterparty’s responses on the other. Each intersection shows the coverage status with a visual indicator:

  • Full coverage (green)
  • Partial coverage (amber)
  • No coverage / gap (red)

Arguments with no response or partial response feed into the Gaps & Questions analysis, where Garry generates specific hearing prep questions.